GDC draft ethical guidance, title Dr.

If this message is all you can see, you haven't gone through the SIMPLE and FREE registration process (click Register on the top right of this screen). Register now to open up a fresh new outlook on primary care dentistry.

GDC draft ethical guidance, title Dr.

Postby drstephenmorris » Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:21 pm

The (now appointed, of course!) GDC has produced draft ethical 'guidance'. It has the following section:

Use of the title 'Doctor' (Dr) by dentists.

Dentists should not use the courtesy title 'doctor' (or the abbreviation 'Dr') unless they have a PhD or are a medically qualified and registered doctor. Its use as a courtesy title is potentially misleading to patients and it is important that patients do not assume that you have training or competencies which you do not possess.


As an original contributor to Dr Douglas Pikes' campaign - he was subsequently elected to the GDC (no chance of things like that happening now, eh?!) - this sort of stuff is frankly insulting. The GDC of all people should be aware of the general equivalence of the BDS and the MB BS. The fact that it appears not to be so aware speaks volumes of the ignorance and small-minded attitudes prevalent in the GDC. The GDC should have spent the last c. 15 years since Dr Pikes' efforts tirelessly plugging away at public awareness of our professional skills and abilities. In addition, we are going to have to fall in line with the rest of the E.U eventually, whether the GDC likes it or not.
I hope the DPA promotes and encorages a massive campaign of disobedience with regard to this issue. Time for us to take a stand! :evil:
drstephenmorris
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:45 pm

Re: GDC draft ethical guidance, title Dr.

Postby drstephenmorris » Thu Jul 29, 2010 8:59 am

A P.S - if you do go to the GDC website to take part in their consultation, it does point-out that as a 'consultation process', it most definitely isn't a vote. I.e they won't take any notice (maybe they have some aversion to votes?). Maybe the way to go with the GDC is to say to HMG that as the CQC registration proposed will largely duplicate the functions of the GDC, then one system/layer of regulation should be binned. Then the GDC can be put into the ring with the CDC, and they can 'fight it out'.......only one to survive.....
drstephenmorris
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:45 pm


Return to The Current File

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron